Talk to UsResponsible AI resourceMenuHomeModel policyDecisionsResearch & approachGet support
Leadership guide/Presidents & leaders
Give the work a purpose, an accountable sponsor and a route to decisions. Match the scope to the people, expertise and capacity available.
In this guideYour responsibilitiesProject sequenceRelated decisionsDownload PDF→
Read, share and use with your team.
Define the institutional problem, the policy scope, the decisions needed and the first deliverables. Identify existing rules and governance bodies that already own part of the work. Give the task force authority to prepare recommendations and resolve only those matters actually delegated to it.
Approval queues, accessible services and meaningful human review require time and expertise. Identify the people who will perform privacy, security, academic, procurement, accessibility and legal review. Provide routes to shared, district or qualified external expertise when capacity is limited.
When a disagreement reaches leadership, require a description of the affected people, applicable constraints, credible alternatives and consequences. Record the decision, its rationale, owner and review conditions. A decision should be visible to the people expected to implement it.
A recommended project sequence
Confirm purpose, scope, authority, participants and existing obligations.
Result: A charter, decision owners and approval route.
Read the model policy against current rules. Prioritize consequential uses and information safeguards. Resolve the substantive choices.
Result: A reconciled policy draft and a short list of decisions needing authority or specialist input.
Walk through advising, learning, vendor, incident and access cases. Test whether the rule, owner and remedy are clear.
Result: Implementation responsibilities, review findings and resolved inconsistencies.
Complete consultation and specialist review. Prepare communications, support and staged implementation.
Result: An approval-ready package, implementation plan and standing review arrangements.
Planning recommendation: six to eight weeks to an approval-ready package when scope and capacity are established. A focused update may take less time; fragmented rules or extensive consultation may take longer. Board calendars, bargaining, specialist review and institutional approval determine the actual schedule.
Purpose & institutional valueWhat should AI help your institution accomplish?→Governance & institutional authorityWho recommends, who decides and who remains accountable?→Tools, use cases & vendorsWhat exactly does an approval authorize?→Human capability & workforce relevanceWhat do people need to be able to do responsibly?→