20 core learning modules
AI Agility
Build your Human × AI collaboration system. Define outcomes, provide context, direct the work, and evaluate and improve the results.
Explore AI Agility
Foundational across every level
Build trust. Reduce risk.
Create impact.
Build the judgment to use AI responsibly across enterprise systems, information, and workflows—protecting people, strengthening accountability, and earning trust.
Download the CIPS brochure (PDF) ↗
CIPS micro-credential combines AI Agility + Responsible & Ethical AI.
For IT professionals, technology leaders, and the enterprise teams they support.
An industry-wide credential
Build practical AI capability and the judgment to use it responsibly. The CIPS micro-credential combines AI Agility + Responsible & Ethical AI—30 core learning modules and approximately 12–15 hours of learning.
Earn an industry-wide CIPS micro-credential on successful completion of both programs. Develop the capability to direct AI collaboration, evaluate its contribution, and take responsibility for the work you deliver.

Professional learning. Industry-wide credential.
30 core learning modules
Approx. 12–15 hours of learning
CIPS micro-credential awarded on successful completion of both programs.
The combined micro-credential program
Bring AI Agility together with Responsible & Ethical AI. Build a more effective way to work with AI, grounded in professional judgment and responsibility.
20 core learning modules
Build your Human × AI collaboration system. Define outcomes, provide context, direct the work, and evaluate and improve the results.
Explore AI Agility ↓10 core learning modules
Apply professional judgment to bias, privacy, evidence, policy, and accountability. Put responsible AI principles into everyday practice.
Explore the modules ↓20 core learning modules to build, adapt, and improve your Human × AI collaboration system.
A useful AI conversation can help with one task. AI Agility develops a repeatable approach: define the outcome, provide context, direct the collaboration, evaluate the result, and refine what works.
Bring a task or workflow from your own work. Explore the four learning areas below to see how you’ll develop that approach.
Learn when AI adds value, how much structure a task deserves, which tool fits, and where human judgment belongs.
Explore: Value beyond speed · Tool and task fit · Human judgment · A collaboration brief
Build the standing context, memory choices, project spaces, examples, and review methods that make good work easier to repeat.
Explore: Working context · Memory · Projects and workspaces · Reusable methods · Advisory boards
Break longer work into stages, manage what AI sees, invite constructive challenge, explore missed options, and examine the people and assumptions a decision touches.
Explore: Context design · Multi-step work · Constructive challenge · New options · Assumptions and impact
Separate evidence from inference, define what good looks like, identify new opportunities, and develop habits that create capacity for worthwhile work.
Explore: Evidence and confidence · Quality standards · Opportunity discovery · Healthy capacity
Develop the ingredients of your own collaboration system: a clear brief, reusable context and instructions, and criteria for reviewing the work. Keep improving the approach as your work and AI change.
The 10-module responsibility component of your 30-module micro-credential. Explore its two areas of study below.
Examine how bias can appear in AI outputs and decisions, and consider whose experiences or perspectives may be missing.
Explain how AI contributed to your work, what you can substantiate, and where uncertainty or limitations remain.
Recognize sensitive information and make informed decisions about what to share, with which tools, and under what conditions.
Consider ownership, permitted use, and appropriate attribution when working with source material and AI-assisted content.
Distinguish a confident answer from a supported one. Verify important information and respond appropriately when evidence is missing.
✓ Knowledge check: Professional Judgment
Identify who owns a decision, who reviews the work, and what responsibility you retain when AI contributes.
Apply your organization’s expectations to practical situations and recognize when to seek guidance or escalate a concern.
Evaluate whether a tool fits the task, the information involved, and the consequences of getting something wrong.
Consider how AI changes people’s work, wellbeing, and ability to make decisions, contribute, and exercise judgment.
Make responsible practice visible through the questions you ask, the standards you uphold, and the example you set.
✓ Knowledge check / Responsible AI Action Brief
In Responsible & Ethical AI, use templates, checklists, frameworks, and guides to examine risks, challenge assumptions, explain decisions, and follow through on your responsibilities.
Bring the learning together in a Responsible AI Action Brief: connect what you’ve examined to the decisions, responsibilities, and next steps in your own context.
Two knowledge checks sit alongside this component’s ten core learning modules.
Explore the combined CIPS micro-credential for yourself or your team.
The case for responsible AI training
Technical capability is one part of enterprise AI adoption. IT teams also need the judgment to question outputs, protect information, and account for decisions.

KPMG · Transforming the Enterprise · 2026
Survey of 1,750 senior transformation leaders across 20 countries and territories, fielded February 2026. Self-reported organizational findings across sectors; they do not measure this program’s impact.
Read the 2026 research ↗NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework calls for AI risk management training for personnel and partners so they can carry out their responsibilities. This program builds practical judgment around the decisions those responsibilities involve. NIST · GOVERN 2.2 ↗
Where responsibility becomes practice
From incident summaries to service decisions, AI can help IT teams work more effectively. Professional judgment determines what information it can use, how outputs are checked, and who remains accountable.

An AI assistant could summarize an incident report. Logs and support tickets include user identifiers, system details, and information your organization must protect.
Check whether the tool and data use are approved. Remove unnecessary identifiers and secrets, respect access boundaries, and use only the information needed for the task. Escalate when the permitted use is unclear.

An AI assistant recommends a configuration change to resolve a service issue. The explanation is convincing, but a mistake could affect availability or access.
Verify the recommendation against authoritative documentation and your environment. Test through approved change controls, check for unintended effects, and keep a person accountable for the decision.

Your team wants AI to triage employee support requests. It could speed up responses, but changes who gets attention, who reviews exceptions, and how people challenge a decision.
Define ownership, human review, and escalation. Examine who could be underserved or unfairly prioritized. Explain AI’s role and preserve a meaningful way for employees to question or correct the result.
Illustrative, AI-generated scenes. The program helps you develop judgment for the context, policies, and responsibilities of your own work.
The organizational value
Good governance gives people a basis for moving forward: a clear purpose, appropriate boundaries, and a way to learn from what happens.
Our synthesis of NIST, ISO, and OECD guidance. These are potential benefits to pursue and assess in your context.
Select a benefit to explore its value and supporting guidance.
Make responsible AI use visible through clear expectations and evidence of how decisions are governed.
Look for: confidence supported by evidence.
ISO · trust and reputation ↗Set expectations for reliable information, traceable inputs, and review before consequential outputs are used.
Look for: better-supported decisions.
ISO · traceability and reliability ↗Build privacy and data protection into decisions about how AI is used and what information it receives.
Look for: appropriate information boundaries.
OECD · privacy and data protection ↗Consider whose interests are affected and create ways to identify, challenge, and address harmful bias.
Look for: concerns identified and acted on.
OECD · fairness and accountability ↗Define who owns a decision, who reviews the work, and how concerns move to the people able to act.
Look for: decisions with an accountable owner.
NIST · Meaure 2.8 ↗Connect AI policies and documented practices to relevant obligations, with a clearer basis for review.
Look for: responsibilities and evidence in place.
ISO · governance and compliance ↗Give teams a structured way to explore AI opportunities while managing the risks of new uses.
Look for: experiments with clear boundaries.
ISO · opportunities and innovation ↗Examine third-party risks and responsibilities before relying on an AI product or service.
Look for: supplier decisions with documented review.
NIST · GOVERN 6 ↗Keep meaningful human oversight and ways to question AI-assisted decisions, protecting people’s ability to contribute and act.
Look for: usable review and challenge routes.
OECD · agency and transparency ↗Use monitoring, incident reporting, and regular review to detect issues and improve the way AI is used.
Look for: timely correction and follow-through.
NIST · GOVERN 1.5 and 4.3 ↗People make governance work. Training equips them to apply it. Leadership, policies, technical controls, and ongoing monitoring put that capability into practice.
Build your team’s capability →

Partnership announcement
CIPS and humanskills.ai are partnering to help professionals build the capability to use AI effectively, exercise sound judgment, and take responsibility for the results.
The micro-credential brings together AI Agility and Responsible & Ethical AI: 30 core learning modules and approximately 12–15 hours of learning. Successful completion of both programs leads to the industry-wide CIPS micro-credential.
Since 1958, CIPS has advanced standards, best practices, and integrity in Canada’s IT profession. As AI changes how we work, that responsibility extends to how we direct it, evaluate its contribution, and consider the people affected.
“Public trust depends on the choices professionals make. Through our partnership with humanskills.ai, we want to help our members turn ethical principles into everyday practice: questioning outputs, protecting people, and taking responsibility for the work they put into the world.”
Responsible & Ethical AI’s ethical foundation is the CIPS Code of Ethics, adapted from the ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Practical learning helps you apply that foundation to your own work. Explore the Code ↗
Featured partner / Excell IT
Our partner Excell IT brings a perspective grounded in the technology, systems, and information businesses depend on.
With services spanning managed IT, cybersecurity, cloud, and digital transformation, Excell IT works where technology decisions meet operational responsibilities. That context matters when people begin using AI in their everyday work.
Responsible & Ethical AI builds the judgment people need alongside their organization’s tools, policies, and technical safeguards.

“When a business brings AI into its work, the everyday decisions matter: what information people share, which outputs they trust, and when they ask for help. Our partnership with humanskills.ai supports the practical judgment that helps teams use AI with confidence and care.”
A few useful answers
Find the learning that fits your work, your responsibilities, and the people who rely on your decisions.
IT professionals, technology leaders, and enterprise teams who use AI, review its outputs, or shape how it is used in organizational workflows. The combined program develops practical AI collaboration alongside judgment around evidence, fairness, privacy, policy, accountability, and the effects on people.
Responsible & Ethical AI provides 10 core learning modules on professional judgment and responsible AI at work. For the CIPS micro-credential, it combines with the 20 core learning modules in AI Agility. Together, the two programs comprise 30 core learning modules and approximately 12–15 hours of learning. Explore all HumanSkills programs →
Responsible & Ethical AI is grounded in the CIPS Code of Ethics, adapted from the ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. You apply that foundation to practical questions about AI use in your own context.
The CIPS micro-credential requires successful completion of both AI Agility and Responsible & Ethical AI. The combined program comprises 30 core learning modules and approximately 12–15 hours of learning. Completing both programs leads to the industry-wide CIPS micro-credential.
Yes. Share the roles involved, approximate team size, and the AI decisions your people face. We’ll discuss the program and an approach that fits your organization’s context. Tell us about your team →
A decision, task, or workflow you want to examine, using a fictionalized or appropriately shareable example. Have relevant organizational policies available and consider who could be affected by the work.
Tell us how you’d like to take part in Responsible & Ethical AI. We’ll help you explore the program and enrollment options.