Talk to UsResponsible AI resourceMenuHomeModel policyDecisionsResearch & approachGet support
Leadership guide/Source library
Read the observation, check its scope and follow the official source for the full provision. These links support specific comparisons, not whole-institution rankings.
US community & technical colleges · A–LUS community & technical colleges · M–ZOther US colleges, universities & systemsInternational institutions & systems33 source locations · 27 named institutions or systems · September 2026 edition
Artificial Intelligence Syllabus Policies
Supplies prohibited, permitted and required options within an institutional syllabus requirement.
Scope: Faculty syllabi. Type: syllabus guidance.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
6Hx2-8.09: Acceptable Use of Artificial Intelligence
Employees must verify AI-derived information and meet attribution and rights requirements. Protected data and model-training uses require purpose-specific IT approval. Employees use approved, provisioned tools and route new products and contracts through IT.
Scope: Students, faculty and staff. Type: Board-approved institutional policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-24 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
IS-100.5.0 and IS-100.5.1: Generative AI Policy and Procedure
Publishes GenAI policy IS-100.5.0 and procedure IS-100.5.1 with data classification and approval rules.
Scope: College systems, technology and data. Type: policy and procedure on one page.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy 5.19
Independent verification and user accountability. No protected data in public/external tools. Instructional/evaluative disclosure; student citation follows course tier/instructions.
Scope: College faculty/staff, students, contractors/vendors. Type: Board-approved policy and tiered procedure.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Board-approved acceptable-use policy with detailed AI requirements
Risk-appropriate verification; users accountable. Sensitive data needs use-specific approval; classification follows outputs. IT/procurement review tools, integrations, contracts and use cases.
Scope: All college technology/data users; academic and operational AI. Type: Board-approved acceptable-use policy with detailed AI requirements.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
District Governing Board-approved policy50-00
Policy supports responsible AI consistent with mission and values and requires privacy, equity, integrity and legal compliance. It does not specify the operational mechanisms asked by Q01-Q18. All N codes mean not established in this short policy, not absence of institutional practices. Linked implementing procedures remain unexamined. Original text-extraction failure retained; PDF/hash and visual review establish the source body.
Scope: College education and operations; one-paragraph statement. Type: District Governing Board-approved policy50-00.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
CW 110: Safe and Ethical Adoption of Artificial Intelligence
Employees verify AI work before use and remain responsible. Restricted or confidential information is barred from unapproved or consumer tools. IT approves tools and enforces technical requirements.
Scope: Employees and institutional AI deployments. Type: Effective college-wide policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-24 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
IT 150: Artificial Intelligence Data Management
Human review is required before operational use. Data classes determine permitted environments; protected data need explicit controls and agreements. IT approves tools and Contracts Management approves agreements.
Scope: Employees, contractors and vendors handling institutional data. Type: Effective data-management policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-24 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
SP 2-60a: Artificial Intelligence
Students evaluate AI content for accuracy and fairness. Protect PII/proprietary/sensitive data and implement security measures. Citation understanding and transparency; faculty discuss their own use.
Scope: System employees and students including member colleges; one system decision. Type: Approved system procedure.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
BP 2-60: Artificial Intelligence
Sets a human-centered, shared-governance framework for AI adoption.
Scope: Colorado community college system. Type: board policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Artificial Intelligence Guide
Explains approved tools, data precautions and the process for requesting tool review.
Scope: College technology users. Type: guidelines.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Common Syllabus Statements
Links course AI expectations to suggested statements within the common-syllabus framework.
Scope: Common syllabus requirements. Type: syllabus guidance.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
AI Syllabus Statements
Provides different permission models and citation guidance for course use.
Scope: Optional course statement templates. Type: syllabus guidance.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Statement of Principle Regarding AI
Commits to AI literacy, faculty academic freedom, access and authentic learning.
Scope: Institutional principles. Type: principles.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Suggested Syllabus Language Regarding AI
Offers adaptable course language for permitted, limited and prohibited AI use.
Scope: Faculty syllabus options. Type: syllabus guidance.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Adopted board policy
Human responsibility for grading and verification. Broad initial prohibition is qualified later by institutional authorization and agreements. College-account systems require IT preapproval.
Scope: Faculty, staff and administrators; college-related coursework and operations provisions also address students. Type: Adopted board policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Acceptable Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy
Course permissions and attribution govern whether AI assistance constitutes misconduct. Instructors set course rules; students are responsible for clarifying expectations.
Scope: Student coursework. Type: Academic acceptable-use policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-24 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Policy
Individuals retain responsibility; faculty and staff review outputs before use. AI use involving personally identifiable or sensitive information must follow institutional privacy rules. Faculty and operational uses require tools from an approved list, with an IT request route.
Scope: Students, faculty, staff and trustees. Type: Official institution-wide policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-24 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Academic Integrity and Plagiarism
Sets faculty disclosure and course expectations, student acknowledgement and data precautions.
Scope: Students and employees in instruction. Type: academic integrity policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Adopted administrative policy
Meaningful human control and verification before use/sharing. Protected data requires CIO authorization; no college-data training without authorization. Operational tools require security/privacy/accessibility vendor review.
Scope: Employees, students and community members on college property/systems. Type: Adopted administrative policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
AI-Generated Artwork Guidelines
Requires documentation of licensing and college review before AI artwork appears in official materials.
Scope: Marketing and communications. Type: departmental guidelines.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Information Technology Procedures: Artificial Intelligence Policy
Includes a GenAI policy section addressing purchasing, content review, consent and confidential information.
Scope: College users of generative AI. Type: IT policy section.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Academic Honesty Policy
Treats unapproved AI use as possible cheating and preserves complaint and conduct procedures.
Scope: Student academic work. Type: academic integrity policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
8.1.9.1: AI Use in the Education Setting
Connects course rules and attribution to critical evaluation and technology-security procedures.
Scope: Academic AI use. Type: procedure.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
7.2.3.5: Acceptable Artificial Intelligence Usage Guidelines
Requires approval for college AI accounts and purchases, prohibits protected-data entry and requires human review.
Scope: College personnel and institutional technology. Type: procedure.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Official institutional guidance
People retain final decisions and verify output. No sensitive data in unapproved/public tools; minimization. Approved tools required; approval workflow not established here.
Scope: Faculty, students and staff; linked board rules not retrieved. Type: Official institutional guidance.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Board policy plus Cabinet-approved academic-integrity/syllabus procedures
Credit sources and avoid misrepresented authorship; local disclosure detail. Syllabus AI statement required; faculty choose uses and restrictions.
Scope: Student academic work and faculty course expectations. Type: Board policy plus Cabinet-approved academic-integrity/syllabus procedures.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Generative AI Usage Policy
Covers syllabus options, human oversight, access alternatives, professional development and concurrent-enrollment precautions.
Scope: Students, faculty, staff and institutional operations. Type: policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Generative AI Guidelines
Connects AI literacy, accessibility, training and continuous evaluation to responsible adoption.
Scope: College teaching, learning and operations. Type: guidelines.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Policy 010: Artificial Intelligence
Human oversight of AI content and meaningful human involvement in decisions are required. Protected and personally identifiable information requires a security-committee-approved tool. Decision-making AI and tools receiving protected information require security committee approval.
Scope: College-wide. Type: Official college-wide policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-24 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
POL 2.320: Institutional Artificial Intelligence Use
Qualified humans review outputs before sending or acting. PII requires Data Owner/ITS approval and sensitive work approved accounts. ITS approval, vendor terms and service catalogue.
Scope: Employees and contractors; faculty-approved student course use expressly excluded. Type: Adopted institutional policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
AR 1060-01: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Users must review outputs and remain responsible; high-stakes assistance requires careful review. Privacy rules apply and examples prohibit entering identifying information or hiring application materials. Significant influence on outcomes, decisions or public information should be disclosed.
Scope: Learning, administration and service activities. Type: Adopted administrative rule.
Reviewed 2026-09-24 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Board-adopted system AI policy
Human oversight and independent verification. Protected data barred from unapproved systems; training-data opt-outs. Governance oversight, approved-tool controls and local enforcement.
Scope: System and twelve colleges: employees, contractors, vendors and third parties. Type: Board-adopted system AI policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Source library overview→Read the comparisons→
A source note is not a complete comparative review. Publication on an official site does not by itself establish adoption. Narrow academic, departmental and program documents should be read within their stated scope.