Talk to UsResponsible AI resourceMenuHomeModel policyDecisionsResearch & approachGet support
Leadership guide/Source library
Read the observation, check its scope and follow the official source for the full provision. These links support specific comparisons, not whole-institution rankings.
US community & technical colleges · A–LUS community & technical colleges · M–ZOther US colleges, universities & systemsInternational institutions & systems33 source locations · 28 named institutions or systems · September 2026 edition
Institutional academic-integrity policy
General academic-integrity policy with no explicit AI provision in this source. Do not infer AI-specific disclosure, course or review rules from its publisher formal-policy label. Linked disciplinary procedures not examined.
Scope: Graded academic work. Type: Institutional academic-integrity policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Artificial Intelligence Acceptable Use Policy
Covers institutional AI use, committee oversight, annual review and AI literacy.
Scope: Faculty, staff, students and vendors. Type: policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
AI Policy
Sets procurement review, data restrictions, output checking, disclosure and academic integrity expectations.
Scope: Teaching, learning, research and work. Type: policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
School academic policy
Students must independently verify authorities and own substantive judgment. University protections apply; client confidentiality requires explicit supervisor/instructor authorization. Disclose AI contributions to submitted work.
Scope: Law students academic work, clinics and externships. Type: School academic policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
School policy
Students remain responsible for plagiarism and accuracy. Protect research IP and confidential data; avoid cloud processing of unpublished confidential research. Disclose and attribute AI contributions.
Scope: Thayer BE and graduate coursework, research and writing. Type: School policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
Provost academic policy/guidelines
Acknowledge permitted AI use with instructor or disciplinary method. Submitted coursework prohibited by default; faculty may allow use.
Scope: AB undergraduates and special non-degree students. Type: Provost academic policy/guidelines.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
01.06.03: Generative Artificial Intelligence Systems with Institutional Data
Permits public-data use while limiting protected data to authorized services or local managed systems.
Scope: GenAI use with public and institutional data. Type: regulation.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
Artificial Intelligence Policy
Sets principles for human oversight, disclosure, fairness, privacy and academic integrity.
Scope: College AI use. Type: policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
3.15: Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence
Differentiates substantive-use disclosure from routine internal assistance and addresses safe use.
Scope: College community use. Type: policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
President-approved policy1.20
Users review output for accuracy, relevance, bias, copyright and legal requirements. Protected data generally excluded; exceptions require contract protection and written authorization. Protected-data exceptions require CIO/CISO/General Counsel authorization; users must understand contracts.
Scope: University-affiliated activities of students, employees, volunteers and affiliates. Type: President-approved policy1.20.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
University policy125
Users must regularly review AI output for accuracy. Protected-data use or uses affecting legal rights or physical safety require use-case approval. Both the AI Review Committee and Information Security review specified uses.
Scope: Faculty and staff university operations; first three conduct rules also apply to specified outside professional activity. Type: University policy125.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
University policy VII.A.5
Before publication, review AI-assisted content for accuracy, citations, protected data and bias. Sensitive/restricted data require an approved tool and use-case approval by the Data Ethics Committee. New tools and specified uses require review; third-party agreements are evaluated.
Scope: All persons, campuses, units, contractors and consultants using AI for university activity. Type: University policy VII.A.5.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Board on Conduct Affairs policy guidance
Acknowledge non-incidental AI assistance; disclose when uncertain. Default treats AI as human assistance; instructor may alter permission.
Scope: Coursework; page includes separate conduct-process guidance. Type: Board on Conduct Affairs policy guidance.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Functional-area guidelines with explicit requirements
Personal responsibility and accuracy review cannot be delegated. Data-class-specific environments and no-training safeguards. Vendor terms, subprocessors, deletion and data suitability; deployment review.
Scope: All Stanford marketing/communications staff and contractors; SLAC exclusions. Type: Functional-area guidelines with explicit requirements.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Program handbook policy
Students accountable for accuracy and quality. No protected patient or research information in public AI; authorized clinical systems governed separately. Sensitive and clinical uses constrained to approved institutional/site systems.
Scope: Stanford MD and MSPA education and clinical learning. Type: Program handbook policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Advisory committee recommendations
Human responsibility and system ownership throughout lifecycle. Assess data legality and provenance; protect sensitive information. Evaluate higher-risk acquisitions.
Scope: Proposed institutional approach across administration, teaching and research. Type: Advisory committee recommendations.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Systemwide policy6904
Ultimate accountability for AI-related work and action remains with people. Sensitive inputs/outputs require appropriate data-protection and security safeguards. Procurement safeguards and risk-scaled review/approval are institutional requirements.
Scope: System AI governance; applicability header omits community colleges while the body refers to all SUNY institutions. Type: Systemwide policy6904.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
Academic-integrity policy with explicit AI provisions
Instructors communicate course rules; AI permissions depend on assessment outcomes.
Scope: University courses/programs; separate College of Law policy may apply. Type: Academic-integrity policy with explicit AI provisions.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Medical-school coursework policy
Independent authorship and responsibility for output accuracy. Protected data only in secure supported systems; faculty may restrict curricular uploads. Clinical AI requires supported EHR and course authorization.
Scope: Medical students and teaching faculty. Type: Medical-school coursework policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Academic-integrity policy with explicit AI provisions
No unauthorized AI assistance or substituted work; instructor rules in writing.
Scope: Undergraduate/graduate coursework; medicine/pharmacy and research separately governed. Type: Academic-integrity policy with explicit AI provisions.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Official crosswalk of existing policies for AI use
Confidential/restricted data and sensitive research require approved safeguards/tools/uses. Paid and sensitive free tools have procurement/security review routes. AI transcription/assistants may not secretly record or join meetings.
Scope: Institutional/research data and AI-tool review; not a complete teaching policy. Type: Official crosswalk of existing policies for AI use.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
1-006: Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence
Requires risk-management approval and links use to data classification and other institutional obligations.
Scope: UF activities with specified entity coverage. Type: policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Approved university policy X-99.20
Research use must meet funder expectations including validating AI results. Sensitive data should be processed only through approved secure UMB infrastructure. Significant systems and acquisition including free tools require designated institutional review.
Scope: Faculty, staff, students, affiliates, institutional activity and relevant partnerships. Type: Approved university policy X-99.20.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Official institutional guidelines
Own and verify outputs; human oversight on decisions. Approved environments for institutional/sensitive data, with research cautions. Contact IT for review before signing up with institutional credentials, including free tools.
Scope: Faculty, staff, students and affiliates across teaching, research and administration. Type: Official institutional guidelines.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Academic-integrity policy with explicit AI provisions
Do not represent generated work as own; attribute permitted sources. Faculty explicitly authorize tools and communicate expectations.
Scope: Academic courses and integrity proceedings. Type: Academic-integrity policy with explicit AI provisions.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Official OIT AI policy/guidelines page
Human review and evaluation are required. Users are strongly advised against sensitive-data input; unauthorized access must be prevented. Users should initiate OIT vendor-risk assessment.
Scope: University resources and work performed for the institution, including students, employees and contractors. Type: Official OIT AI policy/guidelines page.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Official 2023 guidance explicitly described as not final policy
Users remain accountable; verification and oversight of business-process outputs are expected. Patient data may not enter public tools absent approval; other protected data/IP require safeguards and review. Protected-data use requires contracts and privacy/security/procurement consultation.
Scope: Third-party generative AI for educators, staff, researchers and students. Type: Official 2023 guidance explicitly described as not final policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Institutional AI policy
Human review and responsibility for AI outputs and actions. Data-tier permissions; controlled data exception approval; prohibit unauthorized vendor model training. Tool/use-case, contracts, system-owner connections and account controls.
Scope: Faculty, staff, students, guests and third parties acting for USC. Type: Institutional AI policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Board policy BT0035
Authors are responsible for permitted use of AI-generated material in their academic work. Protected university data may enter only CIO-reviewed and authorized AI tools. CIO/designee reviews tools for protected-data use.
Scope: Instructional and assignment uses across University of Tennessee academic courses; not Tennessee Board of Regents. Type: Board policy BT0035.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Artificial Intelligence Policy
Covers AI governance, human oversight and privacy/security-by-design across institutional applications.
Scope: University design, procurement, configuration and deployment. Type: policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Generative Artificial Intelligence
Requires users to assess non-university tools against university security standards.
Scope: Faculty, staff and students. Type: policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Artificial Intelligence Use
Applies security, least-privilege, accountability and data-classification requirements across AI system types.
Scope: Institutional use including embedded and agentic systems. Type: policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Academic-integrity policy with explicit AI provisions
Cite generated content with subject-area conventions. Generative-capable tools default prohibited, including non-generative uses; faculty may authorize. Assistive tools treated separately.
Scope: Undergraduate schools and academic-integrity proceedings. Type: Academic-integrity policy with explicit AI provisions.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Source library overview→Read the comparisons→
A source note is not a complete comparative review. Publication on an official site does not by itself establish adoption. Narrow academic, departmental and program documents should be read within their stated scope.