Talk to UsResponsible AI resourceMenuHomeModel policyDecisionsResearch & approachGet support
Leadership guide/Source library
Read the observation, check its scope and follow the official source for the full provision. These links support specific comparisons, not whole-institution rankings.
US community & technical colleges · A–LUS community & technical colleges · M–ZOther US colleges, universities & systemsInternational institutions & systems43 source locations · 30 named institutions or systems · September 2026 edition
Approved district data-security guidance
Public, nonidentifying inputs only; protect confidentiality and intellectual property.
Scope: Maricopa district community. Type: Approved district data-security guidance.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
District administrative regulation, academic misconduct section
Attribution required for another person/entity's work. Unauthorized AI assignment/exam completion depends on instructor approval.
Scope: District students; one system rule. Type: District administrative regulation, academic misconduct section.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
Official district faculty guidance
Collect artifacts and use human judgment beyond detectors. Faculty set clear course and assignment expectations.
Scope: Classroom AI expectations and suspected academic misconduct. Type: Official district faculty guidance.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
Adopted computing acceptable-use policy with AI provision
AI users must protect confidential/sensitive data and privacy. Authorized-resource use and evaluation of tool security; no distinct AI acquisition workflow in this text.
Scope: Authorized users of college computing resources. Type: Adopted computing acceptable-use policy with AI provision.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Adopted administrative policy
Users verify all generated content and review code. Permissible-data routes coexist with protected-data prohibition; interpretation needs clarification. IT internal review permits some data/use routes and evaluates security/accessibility/privacy/IP.
Scope: Faculty, students, employees, contractors and partners; assessments and deployment. Type: Adopted administrative policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
E0202-2: Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence
Users remain accountable for accuracy, bias, rights and confidentiality. A data-classification table prohibits restricted and sensitive inputs; an earlier provision also discusses IT review. Institutional data use has an internal IT review route; the data table also sets categorical restrictions.
Scope: All users of college systems and data. Type: Approved institutional policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-24 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Institutional teaching/learning policy with date inconsistency
Faculty/student accountability, verified outputs and human assessment. Privacy/data-policy compliance for AI grading, student use and external sharing. Grading/feedback transparency required; course-material citation encouraged.
Scope: All teaching and learning; syllabus requirement effective Spring 2027. Type: Institutional teaching/learning policy with date inconsistency.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Academic Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Policy for Students and Faculty
Student/faculty nonpublic or copyrighted work subject to contracts/author permission/public-domain conditions. Instructor permissions and syllabus communication. College provides academic AI training/support.
Scope: Students and faculty. Type: Effective institutional academic policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Effective institutional workplace policy
No nonpublic data in public AI; rights-owner permission for copyrighted work. All work-related AI tools vetted regardless of device ownership.
Scope: All employees including interns/student workers; all work-related devices. Type: Effective institutional workplace policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Academic Integrity Policy
Includes AI in source attribution and unauthorized-assistance provisions.
Scope: Student academic work. Type: academic integrity policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Adopted board policy plus approved procedure
Users accountable; output review and human oversight of generated code. Protected data requires provider agreement or appropriate approval. Acquisition and integrations require IT/security/accessibility and legal review.
Scope: College users; all emerging technology regardless of price/access. Type: Adopted board policy plus approved procedure.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Official implementing guidance and tool/data matrix
Review meaning, sources and accuracy; supervisors own appraisal reasoning. Public/sensitive/confidential data routes; high-risk data barred even from enterprise in matrix. Technology request and security/accessibility/legal review.
Scope: College community; administrative and instructional examples. Type: Official implementing guidance and tool/data matrix.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Institutional AI principles/policy in current college catalogue
Human oversight and accountable verification. Protected-data exceptions require agreement; student-work consent and anonymization. Vendor evaluation and change notices; agreements may end.
Scope: Students, faculty, staff and third-party partners. Type: Institutional AI principles/policy in current college catalogue.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Approved employee administrative operating guideline
All AI content reviewed; employees verify accuracy/bias and adapt output. No confidential/sensitive/identifiable data in AI. No staff content-creation disclosure; institutional statement and autonomous-interaction notice required.
Scope: Employees; instructional materials, administration, research and marketing. Type: Approved employee administrative operating guideline.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Practical Nursing: Generative Artificial Intelligence Guidelines
Specifies permitted study support and prohibits AI-generated clinical decisions, documentation and unauthorized graded work.
Scope: Practical Nursing program. Type: program guidelines.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Nursing program handbook policy
Review/modify study outputs; retain professional judgment. Permitted assignment use requires tool/contribution disclosure. Instructor permission governs specified assignments; limits for graded/clinical work.
Scope: Associate of Science in Nursing program students. Type: Nursing program handbook policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Use of Artificial Intelligence
Requires an AI statement in each syllabus and gives department policies precedence over instructor policies.
Scope: All college courses and programs. Type: policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
6Hx-18-6.09: Acceptable Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies
Requires security approval and human checking, and rejects detection results alone as automatic proof of misconduct.
Scope: Faculty, staff, students and contractors. Type: board policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
1-4-1000: Artificial Intelligence
College provides education and awareness appropriate to education/workplace.
Scope: Teaching, learning and operations. Type: Approved institutional policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
President-approved implementing procedure
Faculty responsible and review/adjust AI assessments; human judgment retained. Necessary lawful data use, consent/opt-out, minimization and approved secure student input. Data-use notice and grading transparency; student citation conditional on instructor.
Scope: Faculty, staff and students. Type: President-approved implementing procedure.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
2-07: Academic Integrity
Defines AI-related misconduct alongside notice, hearing, evidence review and appeal rights.
Scope: Student academic work. Type: academic integrity policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
Adopted institutional policy
Human oversight and independent output verification. Protected data barred from unapproved tools; minimize data and disable training where possible. AI officer and committee vet systems, including existing platforms.
Scope: Employees, contractors and specified third parties; course rules addressed indirectly. Type: Adopted institutional policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
BP 3716: Artificial Intelligence
Directs procedures, training and evaluation for responsible AI use.
Scope: Board governance and delegated implementation. Type: board policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
Approved administrative procedure
Human review for critical decisions. New PII tools vetted by IT; existing vendors disclose AI. Instructional academic/IT review; administrative supervisor and applicable IT approval.
Scope: Faculty, staff, students, contractors and providers. Type: Approved administrative procedure.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
Task-force recommendations to Academic Senate; adoption not established
Proposed reciprocal transparency. Voluntary adaptable course/assignment levels with faculty autonomy. Proposed town hall and accessible self-paced guides/modules informed by workload barriers.
Scope: Proposed voluntary instructional framework. Type: Task-force recommendations to Academic Senate; adoption not established.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
7.200: Acceptable Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies
Human supervision and crosschecking of generated content are required. Sensitive or confidential data are prohibited except as permitted by college procedure. AI content creation must be disclosed and generated content attributed.
Scope: Staff, students and contracted vendors. Type: Adopted institutional policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-24 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
7.2000: Use of Artificial Intelligence
All users must verify accuracy and bias before use or distribution. Protected information requires approved tools, valid contracts and appropriate safeguards. The CIO or designee reviews college-business systems, with a helpdesk request route.
Scope: Implementation of policy 7.200. Type: Adopted implementing procedure.
Reviewed 2026-09-24 · Earlier source check; automated refresh unresolved.
Academic Integrity Policy
Addresses unapproved AI assistance, attribution and the faculty response to suspected misconduct.
Scope: Student academic work. Type: academic integrity policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Resolution 2025-58 with Artificial Intelligence Policy
Board resolution adopts the attached policy on human review, data protection and approval of system integrations.
Scope: Employees, students and authorized users. Type: board resolution and policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
AI Ethical Use Standards
Defines security vetting, protected-data restrictions and human oversight under cited board policies.
Scope: Use through college networks or accounts. Type: standards.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
8040: Acceptable Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies
Establishes acceptable use, data protection, academic integrity and human responsibility.
Scope: Faculty, staff, students and contractors. Type: policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Generative AI Academic Use Policy
Students retain responsibility for information used in their work. Students should cite or describe AI that contributes content to graded work. Students follow course rules; faculty should communicate specific expectations.
Scope: Academic use by the college community. Type: Approved academic-use policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-24 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
CRB Regulation: Artificial Intelligence
An authorized human evaluates the basis for consequential decisions and may change or reject them. Covered AI interactions require clear, timely notice. Assistive use and generative content creation have different permission rules, linked to learning outcomes.
Scope: District AI procurement, deployment and use. Type: District AI regulation.
Reviewed 2026-09-24 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
3.5.2: Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence (Augusta Technical College copy)
Establishes a system policy covering AI deployment across colleges and work units.
Scope: Georgia technical college system. Type: system policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Adopted system policy
Policy delegates substance to procedure. No negative inference about the system from this short document; interpreted jointly with TCSG-02.
Scope: All system colleges/work units; one governing system. Type: Adopted system policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Adopted system procedure
Human-in-the-loop, multiple reviewers and designated approval before publication/decisions. Sensitive data authorized for proposed use and protected; consent when necessary. College/system procurement review, collaboration agreements and predeployment testing.
Scope: All affiliated technical colleges and system work units. Type: Adopted system procedure.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Official instructor assignment-design guidance
Verify technical claims against authoritative materials. Work plan, verification appendix and prompt-history submission. Assignment-specific restricted, assisted or integrated AI use.
Scope: Technical College System of Georgia instructional practice; suggestions, not separate institutional adoption. Type: Official instructor assignment-design guidance.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Official electronics/industrial teaching supplement
Verify calculations and safety/code compliance; check physical troubleshooting and code logic.
Scope: Technical labs and design assignments. Type: Official electronics/industrial teaching supplement.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Official institutional policy; approval date not established
Supervisor review of final products; senior approval for public presentation. No PII; directory information exception; erroneous PII prompts should be deleted. Institutional account, IT alternatives and VP instruction approval for curriculum use.
Scope: Faculty, staff and students; detailed access rules principally employee use. Type: Official institutional policy; approval date not established.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
3-2-0: Artificial Intelligence
Broad TTC-data ban and protection duties; no inferred exception. Only approved tools/accounts; committee evaluates use cases. Substantive contribution disclosure with routine institutional assistance exemption.
Scope: Employees, faculty, students, contractors and affiliates. Type: Approved institutional policy.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
1551: Use of Artificial Intelligence
Requires clear course rules, dean approval of course policies and annual policy review.
Scope: College community using college AI technology. Type: policy.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
VII:01:30 Use of Artificial Intelligence
Explicitly adopts TBR policy 1.08.10.00.
Scope: College adoption of Tennessee system policy. Type: system policy adoption.
Source note checked 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Institutional catalogue AI policy C2004/E1003
Institutional/protected data require written CIO consent. CIO/Data Governance Committee direct use and review technology. Department norms with course-level discretion; communicate in syllabi.
Scope: College operations and student work. Type: Institutional catalogue AI policy C2004/E1003.
Reviewed 2026-09-21 · Text retrieved in September refresh.
Source library overview→Read the comparisons→
A source note is not a complete comparative review. Publication on an official site does not by itself establish adoption. Narrow academic, departmental and program documents should be read within their stated scope.